Suppliers
United Kingdom
Metapack
Overview
This profile is not managed yet, if you would like to manage
this profile, please contact us at team@iotone.com
this profile, please contact us at team@iotone.com
 |
Metapack |
| United Kingdom | |
| London | |
| 1999 | |
| Private | |
| $10-100m | |
| 201 - 1,000 | |
| Open website |
IoT Snapshot
Technology Stack
Case Studies
Number of Case Studies6
|
Managing Pierce Ab’s International Expansion with Local Delivery Solutions
Pierce AB, an eCommerce operator in the motorcycle and snowmobile industry, was facing the challenge of presenting a local face to customers across 16 countries. The company was looking for a way to consolidate and streamline its logistics while providing exceptional customer service. The company was also looking to scale its business interests internationally. Before implementing MetaPack, Pierce AB was served by only four carriers, which was insufficient for its wide geographical range and growing customer base. |
|
|
Rising to Challenges of International Expansion through Smart Delivery
ASOS, an online fashion and beauty retailer, was facing complications in international delivery, particularly in documentation and data. The requirements for these vary by country of destination, adding to the complexity. The company’s international delivery processes required manual intervention to regularly contact carriers and update prices within the ASOS fulfilment systems, as well as paperwork for each order to meet necessary customs regulations. ASOS wanted to manage its increased volume in deliveries and destinations, minimise manual tasks and paperwork, and achieve the best price for carriers around the globe. |
|
|
Automation through MetaPack Leads to significant cost Savings
Childrensalon, one of the UK’s largest online retailers of children’s fashion, was running a manual despatch operation that used a number of different carriers. In order to process orders through the website, picking lists and invoices had to be printed manually. Although systems were automated as far as possible, there was pressure on staff to select the best carrier and to ensure that all necessary paperwork had been completed correctly. Once the goods were in transit, obtaining tracking information was a time-consuming task that placed an additional burden on customer service personnel. This inefficient use of time and resource combined with the lack of sufficient tracking information led to a procedure that would enable the company to maintain exceptional levels of service to customers. |
