Case Studies Multi-National Electronics Manufacturer Improves Quality Across Supply Chain

Edit This Case Study Record

	Multi-National Electronics Manufacturer Improves Quality Across Supply Chain

Multi-National Electronics Manufacturer Improves Quality Across Supply Chain

Technology Category	Analytics & Modeling - Predictive Analytics Application Infrastructure & Middleware - Data Exchange & Integration Functional Applications - Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP)
Applicable Industries	Electronics Equipment & Machinery
Applicable Functions	Business Operation Quality Assurance
Use Cases	Predictive Quality Analytics Process Control & Optimization Remote Asset Management
Services	Software Design & Engineering Services System Integration
Challenge	Disparate Systems Impact Manufacturing Quality Due to Lack of Visibility Across Silos and a Reliance on Manual Approaches. A corporate quality manager has responsibility for ten plants in North America. Whenever he received a complaint from a customer he would cringe – he felt like he was personally letting his customer and his company down. And he felt powerless to change the situation. Each facility had their own way of tracking defect data, and as the company acquired new plants the problem got worse. At the end of the month, the corporate quality manager received ten reports of the plants’ issues and resolutions, each in its own format. Every month he spent hours and hours compiling data and looking for patterns. It was next to impossible to figure out the root cause of the problem, let alone try to resolve it. “It was difficult for me to understand which plants were doing well… and which plants were not doing well.” Direct Impact on Quality. Disparate systems caused confusion. Customer complaints continued to mount. The corporate quality manager “could not guarantee customers were getting quality products.” The company needed to find a way to improve their quality across the board. Read More
About Customer	The customer is a multi-national electronics company specializing in the production of industrial energy management equipment. This company operates ten plants across North America and has been facing significant challenges in maintaining consistent product quality across its various facilities. Each plant had its own system for tracking defect data, leading to a lack of standardization and visibility. The corporate quality manager, responsible for overseeing quality across all plants, struggled with compiling and analyzing data from disparate sources. This lack of a unified system made it difficult to identify root causes of defects and implement effective solutions, resulting in mounting customer complaints and a sense of powerlessness to ensure product quality. Read More
Solution	Actionable Data Creates Opportunity for Continuous Improvement. The corporate quality manager entrusted Hertzler Systems to provide an integrated platform that combines quality and defect information across multiple plants. The resulting solution provided three advantages: Standardized data collection, Increased timeliness of analytics, Increased visibility at all levels. The Corporate Quality Manager Could Focus on the Analytics. As the company began to use GainSeeker they found that: The plants all collected data in the same system, Defects were accurately captured and logged into a centralized database, The platform provided confidence that the data was accurate. In addition, the standard platform could be adapted to various value streams, collecting defect information with defects appropriate for that product. Shift From Reactive to Proactive Quality Management. It was no longer necessary to wait for the reports to come from the plant. He was empowered to access standardized, integrated quality information in real-time, getting a better sense of what is happening now instead of last month. This enabled the plants to react more quickly, minimizing risks and increasing their autonomy. Read More Log in to view content
Contents

Technology Category

Analytics & Modeling - Predictive Analytics

Application Infrastructure & Middleware - Data Exchange & Integration

Functional Applications - Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP)

Applicable Industries

Electronics

Equipment & Machinery

Applicable Functions

Business Operation

Quality Assurance

Use Cases

Predictive Quality Analytics

Process Control & Optimization

Remote Asset Management

Services

Software Design & Engineering Services

System Integration

Challenge

Disparate Systems Impact Manufacturing Quality Due to Lack of Visibility Across Silos and a Reliance on Manual Approaches. A corporate quality manager has responsibility for ten plants in North America. Whenever he received a complaint from a customer he would cringe – he felt like he was personally letting his customer and his company down. And he felt powerless to change the situation. Each facility had their own way of tracking defect data, and as the company acquired new plants the problem got worse. At the end of the month, the corporate quality manager received ten reports of the plants’ issues and resolutions, each in its own format. Every month he spent hours and hours compiling data and looking for patterns. It was next to impossible to figure out the root cause of the problem, let alone try to resolve it. “It was difficult for me to understand which plants were doing well… and which plants were not doing well.” Direct Impact on Quality. Disparate systems caused confusion. Customer complaints continued to mount. The corporate quality manager “could not guarantee customers were getting quality products.” The company needed to find a way to improve their quality across the board.

About Customer

The customer is a multi-national electronics company specializing in the production of industrial energy management equipment. This company operates ten plants across North America and has been facing significant challenges in maintaining consistent product quality across its various facilities. Each plant had its own system for tracking defect data, leading to a lack of standardization and visibility. The corporate quality manager, responsible for overseeing quality across all plants, struggled with compiling and analyzing data from disparate sources. This lack of a unified system made it difficult to identify root causes of defects and implement effective solutions, resulting in mounting customer complaints and a sense of powerlessness to ensure product quality.

Solution

Actionable Data Creates Opportunity for Continuous Improvement. The corporate quality manager entrusted Hertzler Systems to provide an integrated platform that combines quality and defect information across multiple plants. The resulting solution provided three advantages: Standardized data collection, Increased timeliness of analytics, Increased visibility at all levels. The Corporate Quality Manager Could Focus on the Analytics. As the company began to use GainSeeker they found that: The plants all collected data in the same system, Defects were accurately captured and logged into a centralized database, The platform provided confidence that the data was accurate. In addition, the standard platform could be adapted to various value streams, collecting defect information with defects appropriate for that product. Shift From Reactive to Proactive Quality Management. It was no longer necessary to wait for the reports to come from the plant. He was empowered to access standardized, integrated quality information in real-time, getting a better sense of what is happening now instead of last month. This enabled the plants to react more quickly, minimizing risks and increasing their autonomy.

Impact #1	Unparalleled Visibility and Autonomy. This data visibility increased at every level. Operators could check on their current production. Plant managers could see how their individual plant was doing that day. And corporate quality managers could get a bigger picture across value streams. And from that high level, they could drill down to the operator level within a few clicks. “Our executives could not believe you could drill all the way down to the employee who found the defect in a matter of seconds.”
Impact #2	Confidence of Improved Quality Through Continual Improvement and Visibility. With full visibility into trusted information across plants, it is now possible to put continuous improvement methods in place that optimize the entire supply chain, increasing supply chain flexibility. The corporate quality manager can take pride in the improvement of quality, in the analytics, as well as in the associated decrease in client reported defects.

Impact #1

Unparalleled Visibility and Autonomy. This data visibility increased at every level. Operators could check on their current production. Plant managers could see how their individual plant was doing that day. And corporate quality managers could get a bigger picture across value streams. And from that high level, they could drill down to the operator level within a few clicks. “Our executives could not believe you could drill all the way down to the employee who found the defect in a matter of seconds.”

Impact #2

Confidence of Improved Quality Through Continual Improvement and Visibility. With full visibility into trusted information across plants, it is now possible to put continuous improvement methods in place that optimize the entire supply chain, increasing supply chain flexibility. The corporate quality manager can take pride in the improvement of quality, in the analytics, as well as in the associated decrease in client reported defects.

Benefit #1	Significant increase in product quality.
Benefit #2	Reduction in client-reported defects.

Benefit #1

Significant increase in product quality.

Benefit #2

Reduction in client-reported defects.

Download PDF Version

Overview

Multi-National Electronics Manufacturer Improves Quality Across Supply Chain

Operational Impact

Quantitative Benefit