Case Studies
Global Crossdock Expansion Solution Creates a Competitive Advantage
Overview
Functional Applications - Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) Functional Applications - Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) | |
Consumer Goods Retail | |
Logistics & Transportation Warehouse & Inventory Management | |
Inventory Management Supply Chain Visibility Warehouse Automation | |
Software Design & Engineering Services System Integration | |
Operational Impact
C.H. Robinson helped Energizer Holdings establish a stronger link across product lines. Because all suppliers — no matter the product — coordinate transportation with C.H. Robinson, Energizer Holdings is able to achieve more comprehensive visibility to their supply chain. This helped them surmount the efficiency challenges caused by the previous independent processes. “C.H. Robinson’s straightforward communication and support in resolving problems has helped us overcome challenges and be more responsive,” stated Wright. “Their reliable service acts as a strong pillar for our entire supply chain.” | |
The greatest cost savings were achieved from the consolidation of goods at the crossdock facility, but the crossdock expansion led to reduced distribution costs throughout Energizer Holdings’ supply chain. Beyond savings, Energizer Holdings has achieved value in many other areas of their global supply chain: Established new container fill rate thresholds in conjunction with an updated container optimization strategy and a twice-weekly deployment schedule. | |
Ongoing improvement efforts will continue to yield results well into the future. Energizer Holdings and C.H. Robinson plan to implement similar crossdock solutions in other areas of the world, starting with several Latin America countries, for maximum benefit around the globe. Wright stated, “The team at C.H. Robinson is good at offering solutions. Through open discussions, they helped us understand all our options and what to expect from the start. This helped us make the right decisions and achieve our goals.” | |
Quantitative Benefit
Reduced total weight and volume shipped between U.S. DCs by 65% | |
Eliminated use of 20’ shipping containers for more cost effective 40’ containers | |